I run a strict rules-based IV crush framework each week to screen for earnings put-selling setups. The core filter isn't just elevated IV — it's whether IV is elevated relative to what the stock actually moves on earnings day . If IV is high because the stock is broken or facing real uncertainty, that's not an edge, that's real risk. Strikes are set at roughly 1.4x the implied move to the downside, targeting 15–20 delta.

This week: no clear qualifying trades.

Three names are worth a Monday live-chain check before deciding:

AXP (~$333) → conditional strike ~$310 | Apr 23 BMO | Strong beat history, stable business. Flag: AXP just announced an acquisition (Hypercard, April 16) — check whether that changes the IV picture or counts as a non-earnings event. Verify IV percentile and term structure before entry.

ISRG (~$460) → conditional strike ~$410 | Apr 21 BMO | High-quality med-tech, strong beat rate. Flag: stock recently formed a death cross (50-day crossing below 200-day). That's a momentum red flag — confirm it's still above the 200-day MA before proceeding.

TXN (~$175) → conditional strike ~$160 | Apr 22 AMC | Deep options market, clean chart. Check for semiconductor tariff/export news this week before entry.

Most other names didn't qualify — defense stocks (RTX, GE) move more than their implied ranges historically, while others (BA, IBM, PM) are in downtrends where the elevated IV reflects real risk, not mispricing.

Zero trades is a valid result. The framework only works if you don't force it.

Prices as of April 17 close — verify before entry. Not financial advice.

[留言]

为什么值得关注

能改变理解方式，而不只是重复常识；符合当前抓取需求；它提供了新的理解或解释，而不只是表面观点

来源：reddit，领域：news，保留分：0.68