Has anyone noticed or is it just me, but the BJP’s strategy to win "impossible" states like WB has shifted from ideological conversion to hostile takeover?

​It’s becoming a literal blueprint. If you can’t beat a regional bastion from the outside, you just recruit the person who is the second most strongest person in opposite party.

Look at this

Maharashtra : When Shivsena separated from BJP and joined hands with Congress, they backed Eknath Shinde to basically become the Sena. Then they did the same with the Pawar family to neutralize the NCP.

Assam: They took Himanta Biswa Sarma of the Congress in the Northeast and made him the face of the BJP.

West Bengal: They elevated Suvendu Adhikari, Mamata’s former right-hand man, to lead the charge against her.

The Strategy is brilliant.

Why spend 20 years building a grassroots leader when you can "import" one who already has the booth-level networks, the local muscle, and the funding channels?

These guys know their former party's vulnerabilities better than any BJP lifer ever could.

But, the bigger question is - When you field a "Congress-style" leader under a "BJP" flag, what are the voters actually voting for?

If the "men running the party" are the same people who were running the show 10 years ago under a different flag, does the governance actually change?

[留言]

为什么值得关注

能改变理解方式，而不只是重复常识；符合当前抓取需求；它提供了新的理解或解释，而不只是表面观点

来源：reddit，领域：tech，保留分：0.64