<p>AIPAC complaining of “A level of scrutiny not applied to any other group of citizens.”<br>

<br>

Let’s be precise: No other interest group — not crypto, not AI, not big oil, etc — hides its money in shell PACs. They all spend through PACs that are transparently linked their interest group. <br>

<br>

AIPAC and its major donors are alone in the opposite practice. So that is why reporters have to investigate it so that voters can know who they are backing. The other option would be to just be honest and transparent from the jump. Why not do that? <br>

<br>

According to AIPAC, “Being pro-Israel is good policy and good politics.” Their offshoot DMFI even claims there is a “Democratic majority for Israel.”<br>

<br>

If that is true, spend money openly, endorse candidates openly, and let voters decide. <br>

<br>

If you refuse to do that, we will keep following the money and letting people know who you support. <br>

<br>

If it’s true that being pro-Israel is good politics, we’re doing you a favor!</p>

<hr/>

<blockquote>

<b>AIPAC 🇺🇸🇮🇱 (@AIPAC)</b>

<p>

<p>Part of an orchestrated campaign to single out and demonize individual pro-Israel Americans for supporting candidates of their choice.<br>

<br>

A level of scrutiny not applied to any other group of citizens.<br>

<br>

And it’s tolerated and celebrated by “leaders” who claim to want a big tent.</p>

</p>

<footer>

— <cite><a href="https://nitter.net/AIPAC/status/2060751056385053084#m">https://nitter.net/AIPAC/status/2060751056385053084#m</a>

</footer>

</blockquote>

为什么值得关注

提供了用户原本不知道的新信息；能改变理解方式，而不只是重复常识；它带来了新的事实、进展或信息，不是在重复旧内容

来源：x，领域：news，保留分：0.66