前滩哨兵 Sentry Stars

<p>Excellent news, this was a mistake, it's coming back! <a href="https://nitter.net/PhilippSpiess/status/2061189796689494339">nitter.net/PhilippSpiess/status/2…</a></p>

<hr/>

<blockquote>

<b>Philipp Spiess (@PhilippSpiess)</b>

<p>

<p>Sorry about this! The button was unintentionally removed during some recent menu restructurings. It'll be back with the next hotfix release.<br>

<br>

You can bind a custom keyboard shortcut to the "Copy as Markdown" command and use that as a workaround!</p>

</p>

<footer>

— <cite><a href="https://nitter.net/PhilippSpiess/status/2061189796689494339#m">https://nitter.net/PhilippSpiess/status/2061189796689494339#m</a>

</footer>

</blockquote>

为什么值得关注

提供了用户原本不知道的新信息；有直接可用的方法、工具或操作价值；它带来了新的事实、进展或信息，不是在重复旧内容

来源：x，领域：news，保留分：0.59

<p>Here's what the pork industry doesn't want you to know about the way it sneaked a provision into the 2026 farm bill that would nullify ballot measures that improve animal welfare, while helping Chinese companies torture American pigs. The issue is personal to me, because we once raised pigs on our family farm, and I saw that these are not commodities but animals rather like dogs: smart with very distinct personalities. A naughty boy who punishes a single animal may be punished, but an adult who presides over the systematic abuse of hundreds of thousands of pigs as a business model is hailed as a visionary CEO -- and voters get that, and that's why they have backed laws that improve animal wellbeing. This is, remarkably, an issue that unites many liberals and conservatives alike; <a href="https://nitter.net/TomiLahren" title="Tomi Lahren">@TomiLahren</a>, <a href="https://nitter.net/Cernovich" title="Cernovich">@Cernovich</a> and <a href="https://nitter.net/IngrahamAngle" title="Laura Ingraham">@IngrahamAngle</a> are among those who have been outspoken on this issue. I hope R and D members of Congress alike will stand firm, for the stakes are immense, with four pigs slaughtered around the clock on average all year. Here's a gift link to my piece: <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/30/opinion/pigs-farm-bill-meat-industry.html?unlocked_article_code=1.mVA._gKf.tJaF0tK5nHNG&smid=url-share">nytimes.com/2026/05/30/opini…</a> I welcome your comments.</p>

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/card_img%2F2060680599828856838%2F3-7MzBF_%3Fformat%3Djpg%26name%3D800x419" style="max-width:250px;" />

为什么值得关注

能改变理解方式，而不只是重复常识；符合当前抓取需求；它提供了新的理解或解释，而不只是表面观点

来源：x，领域：tech，保留分：0.64

<p>AIPAC complaining of “A level of scrutiny not applied to any other group of citizens.”<br>

<br>

Let’s be precise: No other interest group — not crypto, not AI, not big oil, etc — hides its money in shell PACs. They all spend through PACs that are transparently linked their interest group. <br>

<br>

AIPAC and its major donors are alone in the opposite practice. So that is why reporters have to investigate it so that voters can know who they are backing. The other option would be to just be honest and transparent from the jump. Why not do that? <br>

<br>

According to AIPAC, “Being pro-Israel is good policy and good politics.” Their offshoot DMFI even claims there is a “Democratic majority for Israel.”<br>

<br>

If that is true, spend money openly, endorse candidates openly, and let voters decide. <br>

<br>

If you refuse to do that, we will keep following the money and letting people know who you support. <br>

<br>

If it’s true that being pro-Israel is good politics, we’re doing you a favor!</p>

<hr/>

<blockquote>

<b>AIPAC 🇺🇸🇮🇱 (@AIPAC)</b>

<p>

<p>Part of an orchestrated campaign to single out and demonize individual pro-Israel Americans for supporting candidates of their choice.<br>

<br>

A level of scrutiny not applied to any other group of citizens.<br>

<br>

And it’s tolerated and celebrated by “leaders” who claim to want a big tent.</p>

</p>

<footer>

— <cite><a href="https://nitter.net/AIPAC/status/2060751056385053084#m">https://nitter.net/AIPAC/status/2060751056385053084#m</a>

</footer>

</blockquote>

为什么值得关注

提供了用户原本不知道的新信息；能改变理解方式，而不只是重复常识；它带来了新的事实、进展或信息，不是在重复旧内容

来源：x，领域：news，保留分：0.66

<p>So funny because the hotel I'm booking now literally says "making a difference and the world a better place" with stock photo of hands holding a globe 😂</p>

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FHJl2yPaWsAEyV3j.jpg" style="max-width:250px;" />

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FHJl2zGoWsAMzneS.jpg" style="max-width:250px;" />

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FHJl2z51XAAA-jNY.jpg" style="max-width:250px;" />

<hr/>

<blockquote>

<b>Jiří Madeja 🇨🇿 (@george_madeja)</b>

<p>

<p>"Help us saving the planet" aka "The only expense we should pay is the mortgage. The bills are just reducing our net profit and if we can make you believe we are actually doing it for common good, these practices will go unnoticed".</p>

</p>

<footer>

— <cite><a href="https://nitter.net/george_madeja/status/2060806915039580556#m">https://nitter.net/george_madeja/status/2060806915039580556#m</a>

</footer>

</blockquote>

为什么值得关注

能改变理解方式，而不只是重复常识；符合当前抓取需求；它提供了新的理解或解释，而不只是表面观点

来源：x，领域：fun，保留分：0.58

<p>my heuristics in life is buying whatever the top 1% most frequent user buy, because their lives rely on the good working most of the time<br>

<br>

most NYC/CHI pilots and flight attendants use Travelpro (and they use transit to the airport) soft top rollaboard. Platinum Elite is great</p>

<hr/>

<blockquote>

<b>@levelsio (@levelsio)</b>

<p>

<p>It's not just luxury hotels that are a scam, it's almost everything that's luxury that's a scam<br>

<br>

Gf bought Rimowa suitcases, expensive and supposed to be better quality than regular ones, but of course they're much worse<br>

<br>

They keep breaking, like all of them, cracks in the handles, cracks in the sides, it's just cheap plastic shit but it costs $1000 or more<br>

<br>

Rimowa was bought by LVMH in 2016 which has an average profit margin of 66% and whose strategy is to increase prices by ~5x, decrease costs by ~5x and then create artificial scarcity (limited availability per shop) because people want what they can't get (not me though but many)<br>

<br>

LVMH is kinda like the luxury version of private equity, it makes everything more expensive and worse and hard to get!</p>

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FHJf6X_QWMAQ8vXD.jpg" style="max-width:250px;" />

</p>

<footer>

— <cite><a href="https://nitter.net/levelsio/status/2060390648986173857#m">https://nitter.net/levelsio/status/2060390648986173857#m</a>

</footer>

</blockquote>

为什么值得关注

能改变理解方式，而不只是重复常识；符合当前抓取需求；它提供了新的理解或解释，而不只是表面观点

来源：x，领域：tech，保留分：0.61

<p>Chronic debaters are lethal to new ideas for the same reason pessimists are. They sound smart because they’re good at finding flaws before anything has had a chance to work.</p>

为什么值得关注

提供了用户原本不知道的新信息；能改变理解方式，而不只是重复常识；它带来了新的事实、进展或信息，不是在重复旧内容

来源：x，领域：news，保留分：0.62

<p>I added AI vision to <a href="http://Hotelist.com">Hotelist.com</a> so you can filter on stuff that it finds in photos of the hotel<br>

<br>

This lets you filter for weightlifting gyms for example and it'll show you their gym in the list so you can immediately see if it's good gym or not<br>

<br>

Same with the other filters like [ 🥯 Cinnamon rolls ] or of course [ 🥩 Steak ]<br>

<br>

(P.S. looks like Holiday Inn reuses pics for other hotels or my scrapers needs a bug fix!)</p>

<a href="https://nitter.net/levelsio/status/2060464712589152745#m">

<br>Video<br>

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/amplify_video_thumb%2F2060463649588756483%2Fimg%2FEox0yJvIiw2CmlSU.jpg" style="max-width:250px;" />

</a>

<hr/>

<blockquote>

<b>@levelsio (@levelsio)</b>

<p>

<p>Agreed, and I can prove that luxury hotels are mathematically literally very bad value<br>

<br>

For the amount of "more" money you pay for this luxury, you should be getting way way way more than you actually get (as measured by ratings)<br>

<br>

Aman should have an average rating of 9.5 but in reality barely hits an 8 on average, so they simply cannot produce the "luxury" experiences they are trying to market and brand themselves for<br>

<br>

It's essentially all smoke and mirrors, and reflects my experiences completely, you pay 10x more and get either 0.5x-1.5x more (eg many times 2x worse, sometimes a bit better) not 10x better!<br>

<br>

Other luxury chains are slightly better but none of them even get close to a 9 rating with the famous Ritz-Carlton being especially bad: its average rating is a 7.68 for a median price of $549/night, terrible!<br>

<br>

Real value can be found with Okura, Minor, Melia and even Marriott. Okura is interesting because well known as luxurious but median only $143/night<br>

<br>

So as I always say, luxury is mostly a scam, it doesn't exist and you're best off spending much less for much better value (and often better experiences too)<br>

<br>

Source: my new site stats page <a href="http://hotelist.com/stats">hotelist.com/stats</a></p>

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FHJfvcKhXYAMUr8M.jpg" style="max-width:250px;" />

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FHJfvcKjXYAQigkt.jpg" style="max-width:250px;" />

</p>

<footer>

— <cite><a href="https://nitter.net/levelsio/status/2060378628014096838#m">https://nitter.net/levelsio/status/2060378628014096838#m</a>

</footer>

</blockquote>

为什么值得关注

能改变理解方式，而不只是重复常识；符合当前抓取需求；它提供了新的理解或解释，而不只是表面观点

来源：x，领域：tech，保留分：0.61

<p>AI can give researchers the freedom to pursue “crazier” ideas.<br>

<br>

For Terence Tao, AI creates more room to experiment, test unexpected paths, and discover what might otherwise stay out of reach.</p>

<a href="https://nitter.net/OpenAI/status/2060451757818601808#m">

<br>Video<br>

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/amplify_video_thumb%2F2060450146928988160%2Fimg%2FGjaEs5ob-9C30uPo.jpg" style="max-width:250px;" />

</a>

为什么值得关注

提供了用户原本不知道的新信息；符合当前抓取需求；它带来了新的事实、进展或信息，不是在重复旧内容

来源：x，领域：tech，保留分：0.60

<p>Congrats!!! First internet money for this guy 🎉🍾</p>

<hr/>

<blockquote>

<b>Edmilson Gomes (@TecEdSocial)</b>

<p>

<p>I was at McDonald's with my mom and sister when it happened. My first internet money(9 freaking dollars$$$) <br>

<br>

Well, not exactly. I'd just left them to go home and work. It was around 9pm. I open my laptop and there's an email.<br>

<br>

Someone paid for my product.<br>

<br>

$9.10. My first ever paying customer. After 3 years of failing.<br>

<br>

I genuinely thought it was a test notification at first. I test everything constantly so I get those all the time. But this one was different. It wasn't me. It didn't have [Sandbox] written in the title. It wasn't my email. It was real.<br>

<br>

I couldn't believe it.<br>

<br>

I started trying to indie hack in April 2023, right after I finished university. I'd just read about <a href="https://nitter.net/levelsio" title="@levelsio">@levelsio</a> a solo founder making $1M+ a year building software products. Something in my brain just switched. I looked at the job market waiting for me here in Portugal. 1,000€/month. And I thought: I don't want this. I want freedom. Geographic, financial, all of it. I want my mom to stop working as hard as she has her whole life.<br>

<br>

So I started building.<br>

<br>

And I failed. A lot. Built SaaS that went nowhere. Pivoted. Killed projects that didn't make sense. Eventually went into freelancing (SEO/CRO for local businesses and SaaS) just to make money and that's actually where I found the pain point that became vitelnk<br>

<br>

vitelnk is a way to share videos with prospects so you can book more meetings and close more deals. I cold email businesses, send them a personalized video audit, and actually see when they watch it and for how long so I can follow up at the right moment. Private links, disable downloads, email-gating, pretty much everything you need. Stuff other platforms just didn't have.<br>

<br>

A few months in, almost 2,000 visitors. 57 users(some were my test accounts) . 83% bounce rate. And $0.<br>

<br>

Then I rebuilt my entire landing page!<br>

<br>

Stopped talking about how great my app is and started talking about their actual problems. Focused on their pain (which I found with my own research and leadverse a tool by <a href="https://nitter.net/jakubmuzzik" title="Jakub Mužík">@jakubmuzzik</a> that allows me to get information on potential buyers pain points they face with other tools and features they need) and the benefits of using video to secure more meetings.<br>

<br>

Days later, the email came in.<br>

<br>

I don't even fully know how she or he idk… found me. I built an analytics tool and STILL hadn't wired up the revenue tracking properly. No idea where she/he came from.<br>

<br>

Doesn't matter.<br>

<br>

They saw the value even without fully trying the product and bought a sub. <br>

<br>

Most indie hackers never get here. I've watched founders come and go on this app for years because they couldn't get a single one. And n…

为什么值得关注

能改变理解方式，而不只是重复常识；有直接可用的方法、工具或操作价值；它提供了新的理解或解释，而不只是表面观点

来源：x，领域：projects，保留分：0.59

<p>It's not just luxury hotels that are a scam, it's almost everything that's luxury that's a scam<br>

<br>

Gf bought Rimowa suitcases, expensive and supposed to be better quality than regular ones, but of course they're much worse<br>

<br>

They keep breaking, like all of them, cracks in the handles, cracks in the sides, it's just cheap plastic shit but it costs $1000 or more<br>

<br>

Rimowa was bought by LVMH in 2016 which has an average profit margin of 66% and whose strategy is to increase prices by ~5x, decrease costs by ~5x and then create artificial scarcity (limited availability per shop) because people want what they can't get (not me though but many)<br>

<br>

LVMH is kinda like the luxury version of private equity, it makes everything more expensive and worse and hard to get!</p>

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FHJf6X_QWMAQ8vXD.jpg" style="max-width:250px;" />

<hr/>

<blockquote>

<b>@levelsio (@levelsio)</b>

<p>

<p>Agreed, and I can prove that luxury hotels are mathematically literally very bad value<br>

<br>

For the amount of "more" money you pay for this luxury, you should be getting way way way more than you actually get (as measured by ratings)<br>

<br>

Aman should have an average rating of 9.5 but in reality barely hits an 8 on average, so they simply cannot produce the "luxury" experiences they are trying to market and brand themselves for<br>

<br>

It's essentially all smoke and mirrors, and reflects my experiences completely, you pay 10x more and get either 0.5x-1.5x more (eg many times 2x worse, sometimes a bit better) not 10x better!<br>

<br>

Other luxury chains are slightly better but none of them even get close to a 9 rating with the famous Ritz-Carlton being especially bad: its average rating is a 7.68 for a median price of $549/night, terrible!<br>

<br>

Real value can be found with Okura, Minor, Melia and even Marriott. Okura is interesting because well known as luxurious but median only $143/night<br>

<br>

So as I always say, luxury is mostly a scam, it doesn't exist and you're best off spending much less for much better value (and often better experiences too)<br>

<br>

Source: my new site stats page <a href="http://hotelist.com/stats">hotelist.com/stats</a></p>

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FHJfvcKhXYAMUr8M.jpg" style="max-width:250px;" />

<img src="https://nitter.net/pic/media%2FHJfvcKjXYAQigkt.jpg" style="max-width:250px;" />

</p>

<footer>

— <cite><a href="https://nitter.net/levelsio/status/2060378628014096838#m">https://nitter.net/levelsio/status/2060378628014096838#m</a>

</footer>

</blockquote>

为什么值得关注

提供了用户原本不知道的新信息；能改变理解方式，而不只是重复常识；它带来了新的事实、进展或信息，不是在重复旧内容

来源：x，领域：news，保留分：0.68